h***@public.gmane.org
2002-12-20 17:21:48 UTC
Haven't had a chance to look it over.
I've joked that, eventually, it will be Tapestry: Java-LESS Web Components.
In parallel with your ideas, I've been thinking of adding support like:
<listener-binding name="listener" language="jython">
cycle.setPage("Foo");
</listener-binding>
Basically, leverage BSF so that you can write listeners in various scripting
languages.
Tapestry could set certain well-defined global variable names: page, engine,
cycle, component, parameters.
The script could then do the whatever.
I think we could shoehorn OGNL into this mold pretty easily.
--
hlship-***@public.gmane.org
http://tapestry.sf.net
does JSP/Struts work. There were two designers and two developers
present. The designers "got" the component model and the way components
are linked much faster than the developers.
Might be unlearning less or just that they are used to dealing with "it
just works that way" and developers want to know the mechanism. I think
that the developers in this case were not used to the idea that you
weren't including a "page" in the result but linking to another
component at runtime. Oh, well.
BTW what did you think of my previous message about OGNL lambda
expressions as actions?
- Drew
--
+---------------------------------+
< Drew Davidson | OGNL Technology >
+---------------------------------+
| Web: http://www.ognl.org /
| Vox: (520) 531-1966 <
| Fax: (520) 531-1965 \
| Mobile: (520) 405-2967 \
+---------------------------------+
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: The Best Geek Holiday Gifts!
Time is running out! Thinkgeek.com has the coolest gifts for
your favorite geek. Let your fingers do the typing. Visit Now.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
I've joked that, eventually, it will be Tapestry: Java-LESS Web Components.
In parallel with your ideas, I've been thinking of adding support like:
<listener-binding name="listener" language="jython">
cycle.setPage("Foo");
</listener-binding>
Basically, leverage BSF so that you can write listeners in various scripting
languages.
Tapestry could set certain well-defined global variable names: page, engine,
cycle, component, parameters.
The script could then do the whatever.
I think we could shoehorn OGNL into this mold pretty easily.
--
hlship-***@public.gmane.org
http://tapestry.sf.net
That's pretty much what I've seen. In fact, the HTML guys seemed to pick up
Tapestry faster than the Java/JSP guys ... less to unlearn. They were used to
bringing the designs (which started as mockup in photoshop) forward to HTML and
were used to the idea that "magic would then occur", and that the Tapestry
magic (even back then, in the era of the <jwc> tag) was not so bad.
I just had an associate show WebOGNL to a local company who currentlyTapestry faster than the Java/JSP guys ... less to unlearn. They were used to
bringing the designs (which started as mockup in photoshop) forward to HTML and
were used to the idea that "magic would then occur", and that the Tapestry
magic (even back then, in the era of the <jwc> tag) was not so bad.
does JSP/Struts work. There were two designers and two developers
present. The designers "got" the component model and the way components
are linked much faster than the developers.
Might be unlearning less or just that they are used to dealing with "it
just works that way" and developers want to know the mechanism. I think
that the developers in this case were not used to the idea that you
weren't including a "page" in the result but linking to another
component at runtime. Oh, well.
BTW what did you think of my previous message about OGNL lambda
expressions as actions?
- Drew
--
+---------------------------------+
< Drew Davidson | OGNL Technology >
+---------------------------------+
| Web: http://www.ognl.org /
| Vox: (520) 531-1966 <
| Fax: (520) 531-1965 \
| Mobile: (520) 405-2967 \
+---------------------------------+
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: The Best Geek Holiday Gifts!
Time is running out! Thinkgeek.com has the coolest gifts for
your favorite geek. Let your fingers do the typing. Visit Now.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/